View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0001024EresseaGeneralpublic2007-04-22 14:16
Reporterkhadar Assigned ToEnno  
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
Status closedResolutionno change required 
Summary0001024: castle and magic bonus on wages do not stack?
Description

It seems that the +1 bonus on wages for having a fortification in a region does not stack with the result of a certain magic spell.

Additional Information

Region Regdokhan - Sargan Delta Worker's salary: 11.

TagsNo tags attached.
Factionreg
Game
Report491

Activities

Bruck

Bruck

2006-09-24 23:00

reporter   ~0002260

Did it worke for the peasants? Is there a spell mesage in the region?

derethor

derethor

2006-09-26 07:48

reporter   ~0002263

That's maybe, because all spells I know increase the income for the peasants only. The workers salary is the salary workers of a faction will get. Peasants have a higher income even without fortification (13, if I remember right -> increased to 15 with spell and fortification).

khadar

khadar

2006-09-27 18:51

reporter   ~0002266

The peasants' income hasn't changed, either; it's been a surplus of 2 per peasant since my first turn (so should be an income of 12, with the fortification I got starting as a human). The spell did not change that...

argelas

argelas

2006-10-16 19:08

reporter   ~0002312

Are you sure that the peasants don't get the extra money? The money in the region is shown in the report, so knowing what you took from them you can calculate ow much money the peasants made. Maybe they got the extra money and the report just does not show the magic bonus.

khadar

khadar

2006-11-20 17:56

reporter   ~0002372

Yes, I'm sure they didn't get the extra money.

Enno

Enno

2007-02-01 22:26

administrator   ~0002493

I had a look the two effects stack, definitely. I consider it pretty unlikely that there is a bug in any of this. But I can take a look.

Enno

Enno

2007-02-01 22:42

administrator   ~0002495

The peasants in this region get a wage of 13, checked with the debugger. Seems okay to me.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2006-09-24 11:51 khadar New Issue
2006-09-24 11:51 khadar Partei/Faction => reg
2006-09-24 11:51 khadar Report No. => 491
2006-09-24 23:00 Bruck Note Added: 0002260
2006-09-26 07:48 derethor Note Added: 0002263
2006-09-27 18:51 khadar Note Added: 0002266
2006-10-16 19:08 argelas Note Added: 0002312
2006-11-20 17:56 khadar Note Added: 0002372
2007-02-01 22:26 Enno Note Added: 0002493
2007-02-01 22:42 Enno Status new => resolved
2007-02-01 22:42 Enno Resolution open => no change required
2007-02-01 22:42 Enno Assigned To => Enno
2007-02-01 22:42 Enno Note Added: 0002495
2007-04-22 14:16 Enno Status resolved => closed